Mon, 28 Dec 2009
RIP Fedora 10
Fedora 10 (Cambridge) (2008-11-25 -- 2009-12-17)
Updates
Source: bodhi![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Torrent
Source: fedoracommunity (upcoming release)| Torrent Name | Number of completed downloads |
|---|---|
| Fedora-10-i386-DVD | 112,807 |
| Fedora-10-x86_64-DVD | 65,965 |
| Fedora-10-i386-CDs | 10,621 |
| Fedora-10-ppc-DVD | 6,851 |
| Fedora-10-source-DVD | 3,740 |
| Fedora-10-x86_64-CDs | 3,141 |
| Fedora-10-ppc-CDs | 1,336 |
| Fedora-10-i686-AOS | 666 |
| Fedora-10-source-CDs | 662 |
| Fedora-10-i686-Live | 599 |
| Fedora-10-x86_64-Live | 336 |
| Fedora-10-x86_64-AOS | 274 |
| Fedora-10-i686-Live-KDE | 201 |
| Fedora-10-x86_64-Live-KDE | 78 |
| Fedora-10-i686-Live-XFCE | 37 |
| Fedora-10-i686-Live-Developer | 13 |
| Fedora-10-i686-Live-FEL | 12 |
| Fedora-10-x86_64-Live-XFCE | 5 |
| Fedora-10-i686-Live-broffice | 3 |
| Fedora-10-x86_64-Live-Developer | 3 |
| Fedora-10-x86_64-Live-FEL | 2 |
| Fedora-10-x86_64-Live-edu-math | 1 |
| Fedora-10-i686-Live-edu-math | 1 |
| Fedora-10-x86_64-Live-broffice | 0 |
| Total | 207,354 |
Yum Data
Source: wiki/Legacy_statisticsConnections to yum
| Week | Dates | New Unique IPs | Total Unique IPs | Total compared to F9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008-11-25 -- 2008-12-01 | 67,421 | 67,421 | 73% |
| 2 | 2008-12-02 -- 2008-12-08 | 81,674 | 149,095 | 97% |
| 3 | 2008-12-09 -- 2008-12-15 | 60,759 | 209,854 | 97% |
| 4 | 2008-12-16 -- 2008-12-22 | 62,527 | 272,381 | 93% |
| 5 | 2008-12-23 -- 2008-12-29 | 68,375 | 340,756 | 97% |
| 6 | 2008-12-30 -- 2009-01-05 | 73,585 | 414,341 | 97% |
| 7 | 2009-01-06 -- 2009-01-12 | 94,166 | 508,507 | 103% |
| 8 | 2009-01-13 -- 2009-01-19 | 85,557 | 594,064 | 106% |
| 9 | 2009-01-20 -- 2009-01-26 | 87,678 | 681,742 | 107% |
| 10 | 2009-01-27 -- 2009-02-02 | 91,014 | 772,756 | 110% |
| 11 | 2009-02-03 -- 2009-02-09 | 95,238 | 867,994 | 113% |
| 12 | 2009-02-10 -- 2009-02-16 | 95,967 | 963,961 | 115% |
| 13 | 2009-02-17 -- 2009-02-23 | 109,800 | 1,073,761 | 115% |
| 14 | 2009-02-24 -- 2009-03-02 | 85,246 | 1,159,007 | -- |
| 15 | 2009-03-03 -- 2009-03-09 | 100,610 | 1,259,617 | -- |
| 16 | 2009-03-10 -- 2009-03-16 | 100,323 | 1,359,940 | -- |
| 17 | 2009-03-17 -- 2009-03-23 | 100,819 | 1,460,759 | -- |
| 18 | 2009-03-24 -- 2009-03-30 | 102,843 | 1,563,602 | -- |
| 19 | 2009-03-31 -- 2009-04-06 | 101,978 | 1,665,580 | 136% |
| 20 | 2009-04-07 -- 2009-04-13 | 99,586 | 1,765,166 | -- |
| 21 | 2009-04-14 -- 2009-04-20 | 101,808 | 1,866,974 | -- |
| 22 | 2009-04-21 -- 2009-04-27 | 100,230 | 1,967,177 | -- |
| 23 | 2009-04-28 -- 2009-05-04 | 97,584 | 2,064,761 | -- |
| 24 | 2009-05-05 -- 2009-05-11 | 95,923 | 2,160,684 | 137% |
| 25 | 2009-05-12 -- 2009-05-18 | 95,632 | 2,256,316 | -- |
| 26 | 2009-05-19 -- 2009-05-25 | 92,377 | 2,348,693 | -- |
| 27 | 2009-05-26 -- 2009-06-01 | 91,747 | 2,440,440 | -- |
| 28 | 2009-06-02 -- 2009-06-08 | 91,513 | 2,531,953 | -- |
Direct downloads
Source: wiki/Legacy_statisticsThe following table shows the number of direct downloads of Fedora 10 media from unique IP addresses, as shown in the web proxy logs. The actual number of raw downloads tends to be much higher.
| Week | Dates | Downloads this week | Total downloads |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008-11-25 -- 2008-12-01 | 236,886 | 236,886 |
| 2 | 2008-12-02 -- 2008-12-08 | 105,994 | 342,880 |
| 3 | 2008-12-09 -- 2008-12-15 | 83,740 | 426,620 |
| 4 | 2008-12-16 -- 2008-12-22 | 76,982 | 503,602 |
| 5 | 2008-12-23 -- 2008-12-29 | 66,351 | 569,953 |
| 6 | 2008-12-30 -- 2009-01-05 | 65,102 | 635,055 |
| 7 | 2009-01-06 -- 2009-01-12 | 72,729 | 707,784 |
| 8 | 2009-01-13 -- 2009-01-19 | 73,301 | 781,085 |
| 9 | 2009-01-20 -- 2009-01-26 | 72,082 | 853,167 |
| 10 | 2009-01-27 -- 2009-02-02 | 71,788 | 924,955 |
| 11 | 2009-02-03 -- 2009-02-09 | 72,529 | 997,484 |
| 12 | 2009-02-10 -- 2009-02-16 | 69,071 | 1,066,555 |
| 13 | 2009-02-17 -- 2009-02-23 | 69,216 | 1,135,771 |
| 14 | 2009-02-24 -- 2009-03-02 | 67,669 | 1,203,440 |
| 15 | 2009-03-03 -- 2009-03-09 | 66,666 | 1,270,106 |
| 16 | 2009-03-10 -- 2009-03-16 | 65,524 | 1,335,630 |
| 17 | 2009-03-17 -- 2009-03-23 | 63,218 | 1,398,848 |
| 18 | 2009-03-24 -- 2009-03-30 | 62,930 | 1,461,778 |
| 19 | 2009-03-31 -- 2009-04-06 | 59,813 | 1,521,591 |
| 20 | 2009-04-07 -- 2009-04-13 | 57,102 | 1,578,693 |
| 21 | 2009-04-14 -- 2009-04-20 | 55,871 | 1,634,564 |
| 22 | 2009-04-21 -- 2009-04-27 | 55,117 | 1,689,681 |
| 23 | 2009-04-28 -- 2009-05-04 | 50,815 | 1,740,496 |
| 24 | 2009-05-05 -- 2009-05-11 | 48,139 | 1,788,635 |
| 25 | 2009-05-12 -- 2009-05-18 | 47,813 | 1,836,448 |
| 26 | 2009-05-19 -- 2009-05-25 | 46,077 | 1,882,525 |
| 27 | 2009-05-26 -- 2009-06-01 | 44,969 | 1,927,494 |
| 28 | 2009-06-02 -- 2009-06-08 | 44,835 | 1,972,329 |
posted at: 18:05 | link | | 0 comments
Sun, 11 Oct 2009
Fedora 12 filesystem showdown
- Kernel: 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.i686.PAE
- I/O Scheduler: CFQ
- Encryption: LUKS/dm-crypt AES-XTS cipher 512 bit key
- Installation Media: rawhide boot.iso (20091010)
- Benchmark: bonnie++
- Graphing script: flotbonnie.py
- Hardware profile: 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.i686.PAE-hardinfo (note: ancient hardware)
- Raw data: 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.i686.PAE-btrfs, 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.i686.PAE-ext3, 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.i686.PAE-ext4, 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.i686.PAE-xfs
posted at: 18:02 | link | | 4 comments
Tue, 14 Jul 2009
Fedora 9 Updates Metrics
Most updated packages
Packages with the best karma
Most updates per developer
Most tested packages
Top testers
posted at: 12:00 | link | | 8 comments
Mon, 26 Jan 2009
bodhi updates push process
Bodhi's push process is something that is usually quite opaque to Fedora package maintainers. Once an update request goes into bodhi, the developer sits back and waits for the update to go to where it needs to go. The ball is then in releng's court, as they must sign the packages, and tell bodhi to begin the push. From there, bodhi does it's thing for a while, and then updates magically end up on our users machines. Yay!
Pushing updates used to take the better part of a day, mostly due to dumb code and lots of filesystem churn over NFS. Thankfully, a lot of the code is now much smarter, and people like jkeating and mmcgrath have been helping to address the NFS & infrastructure bottlenecks.
Hopefully I can help shed some light on one of the dark corners of bodhi known as The Masher. Here are some statistics of the last updates push that happened earlier today.
| Initial push request from releng | |
| Check koji tag / bodhi status consistency | 38s |
| Move all of the build tags in Koji | 9m32s |
| Update the comps CVS module | 11s |
| Mash f9-updates-testing | 4m16s |
| Mash f9-updates | 1h3m8s |
| Mash f10-updates-testing | 12m43s |
| Mash f10-updates | 37m51s |
| Set update ids, state modifications, updates-testing digest generation | 1m57s |
| Generate updateinfo.xml | 5m55s |
| Repo sanity checks & symlinking to go live | 1m4s |
| Cache latest repodata, and remove old | 1m14s |
| Wait for updates to hit the master mirror | 1h1s |
| Send update notices, update/close bugs, notify developers/commenters | 11m11s |
| Total | 3h49m42s |
So we've obviously made some great improvements here, and once the signing server is deployed, you can probably expect a much more frequent/consistent flow of updates. However, I definitely think there is still a lot of low-hanging fruit in this process, and many steps can probably be done in parallel. We're going to be adding DeltaRPM generation into the mix in the near future, so I'll give an update a bit later with some details as to how that effects the process.
Anyway... if you know Python, and enjoy optimizing code -- come talk to me :)
posted at: 23:15 | link | | 0 comments
Mon, 16 Jun 2008
Fedora 7 Update Metrics
Fedora 7 reached End of Life on Friday, June 13th.
Here are some graphs that I generated with bodhi.






- Fedora 7 updates receieved a total of 501 pieces of feedback from testers, 33 of which were anonymous.
posted at: 15:24 | link | | 2 comments
Mon, 07 Apr 2008
ThinkPad X300 vs Z61t vs T43
So I recently purchased a shiny new Thinkpad X300 to replace my T43. I must say that the X300 is an absolutely incredible machine, but I'll let the graphs speak for themselves :)
Below are the results of some benchmarks that I ran comparing the Thinkpad X300, Z61t and T43. All machines were running Fedora 8 using the 2.6.24.3 kernel. CPU benchmarks were done using hardinfo, and disk benchmarks done with bonnie++. Graphs created with flot.
More benchmarks comparing various Fedora releases / configurations coming soon!
posted at: 15:13 | link | | 11 comments













